[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Purposely broken/uninstallable packages in archive

On 19-Sep-01, 18:16 (CDT), Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> wrote: 
> read the description for xfsprogs-bf and e2fsprogs-bf, your NOT
> SUPPOSED to install them.  we need them for boot-floppies.  

Fine. Why are they in the main archive? If it's so that the bf can
access them over the net, then they can and should go into a special


Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>

Reply to: