Re: [RFC] Developer documentation packages.
Roland Mas <firstname.lastname@example.org> immo vero scripsit
> So we'd have some sort of book-get package, like the controversial
> porn-get (which shares the characteristics you've described)?
Heh, so we could indeed have
book-get install packagename
and have preferences for documentation format.
Also, some book-cache search command.
"porn-get" could even be reused/extended to do this job.
The last part (of translating documentation formats)
is not implemented yet, but should be trivial,