Re: [RFC] Developer documentation packages.

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org> immo vero scripsit

> 
>   So we'd have some sort of book-get package, like the controversial
> porn-get (which shares the characteristics you've described)?

Heh, so we could indeed have 

book-get install packagename

and have preferences for documentation format.
Also, some book-cache search command.

"porn-get" could even be reused/extended to do this job.
The last part (of translating documentation formats)
is not implemented yet, but should be trivial,
really.

regards,
	junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer