[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: neat mutt bug.

On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:34:22PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700):
> > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
> > into thinking Branden actually signed this.
> oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at
> least michael elkins should know...

I just sent a copy to mutt-dev@mutt.org, hopefully that list accepts
submissions from non-members.  I personally don't think it's bugtraq worthy,
since careful checking will reveal a bad date, but still, it's important
because the casual reader will most likely believe the data was signed.

Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>

Reply to: