Re: neat mutt bug.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:34:22PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam McKenna (on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:17:37AM -0700):
> > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person
> > into thinking Branden actually signed this.
> oooh. this is ugly. reported it to bugtraq? if not bugtraq, then at
> least michael elkins should know...
I just sent a copy to email@example.com, hopefully that list accepts
submissions from non-members. I personally don't think it's bugtraq worthy,
since careful checking will reveal a bad date, but still, it's important
because the casual reader will most likely believe the data was signed.
Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>