Re: Name for new port WAS: new port
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:42:19AM -0400, Dave Baker wrote:
> As for the '32' or now, I'd be happy to argue against it (after all,
> doesn't it strike anyone else odd how i386 has stuck even though the 386
> itself is now obsolete?)
It just indicates that the last major architecture change intel made was
with the 386. Everything since has just been fiddling around the edges.
Except for the ia64 ofcourse.
Martijn van Oosterhout <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.