On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:11:45PM +0200, wouter@debian.org wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Debian needs to be redhat binary compatible.
> Excuse me?
> "Standard" != "RedHat". There's something called the "Linux Standards
> Base" [...]
Quite frankly, Red Hat makes a better standard than the LSB atm: at least
there's an existing implementation you can compare and contrast against...
The C++ library ABI is heavily dependent on the gcc (g++) version you're
using. Red Hat uses gcc-2.96, which we only ship for ia64.
AIUI, anyway.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpOLlsml2sP9.pgp
Description: PGP signature