[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OpenOffice



Hi...

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:16:21PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>> Printing is ok in the last build.
>> And IMHO the current openoffice is enough to think about a debian package
>> in SID.
>> I prefer to use OO than SO because you avoid the windows-like desktop. But
>> OO remains a fat application with a uggly GUI.
>you see, if an application is able to start(or even if it won't ;)) and will
>not break the whole system and force you to reinstall, this app is suitable
>for sid... that's what it's for... and if it is so buggy a RC bug will quicly
>be filled against it and it won't go into testing, then, every app, even if
>beta, is suitable to unstable...

I think, OO is suitable for debian-sid....

>I use OO instead of SO and that is doing very well, I still prefer typing
>my texts as htmls in emacs but OO is being my mom's (and sister's) word 
>processor since the latest(?) build wich I think is 6.29(?) or such...

:)

>BTW, I remember reading something about someone packaging OO lots of months
>ago... Maybe someone could check wnpp and the archives before doing anything...

Hmmm... Adrian Bunk tried to build it and me is in wnpp etc... :)

	Greetings
			Jan
-- 
One time, you all will be emulated by linux!

----
Jan- Hendrik Palic
Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de";
E-Mail: "palic@billgotchy.de"

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- 
O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ 
G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: pgpWW4SrOgw3T.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: