Re: RFD: getting updated debs as patches (long)
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 11:16:16AM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> This has been proposed numerous times, although your idea of using a
> "standard" protocol (http/ftp) for all of the communication is
> interesting. (ISTR hearing somebody talk about "rsync over http"
> before, though.)
rproxy (http://linuxcare.com.au/rproxy/) seems to be the right way to do this,
assuming it could be modified to fetch the precomputed checksums rather than
relying on talking with an rproxy on the other end.
> Feel free to quote any part of my reply elsewhere.