On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:43:15AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > But we could inform the admin about this change, give them some time to > change all local configurations which involve a group nogroup instead of > nobody and then remove this group. I'm not very happy about the OpenBSD > approach of having two group names for the same purpose. Reducing it to > one, would in my opinion be better, but I will need to think more about > a sane transition plan first. whats wrong with two? its not like there is any shortage of gids, 2.4 has 2^32 of them. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpZAPHypiFJz.pgp
Description: PGP signature