>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> writes: Joshua> * Previously Ari Pollak (compwiz@aripollak.com) wrote: >> > No NM progress -- not even an ID check. >> This is kind of prejudiced against NMs who do not easily have access to >> another maintainer for a keysigning Joshua> Any sponsored package is installed into unstable, Joshua> propagated through all the mirrors, and implicitly bears Joshua> the official Debian stamp. Is it really a good idea to Joshua> distribute and endorse the work of someone whose identity Joshua> hasn't yet been verified? Let me try a variation of this: "Any package is installed into unstable, propagated through all the mirrors, and implicitly bears the official Debian stamp. Is it really a good idea to distribute and endorse the work of someone whose identity hasn't yet been verified?" Yes, I know you're part of upstream for audacity (just checked before I put my foot where it would impede my speech ;-) But... well, do you think *every* maintainer can check *all* upstream IDs? Do *you* know all your co-authors? If you do, consider yourself blessed (or just lucky, depending on religious inclincations ;-). I actually don't see what all the fuss is about: a package was uploaded, and was buggy. Big deal. Happens all the fuckin time. Isn't it called "unstable"? Bye, J PS: This is *very* reminiscent of the old NM flamewar... -- Jürgen A. Erhard (juergen.erhard@gmx.net, jae@users.sourceforge.net) MARS: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard/mars_index.html Bill Gates brought you Windows. Linus brought you the whole DAMN HOUSE!
Attachment:
pgpALT4EFyuT_.pgp
Description: PGP signature