Re: cramfs problems, also file(1)
>> > You need a kernel patch for cramfs on initrd, iirc.
>> ... which debian's kernel-source packages include.
> Which IMHO is wrong. At least the way it is done right now.
> Instead debian should distribute pristine sources together with
> recommended kernel patches (in seperate packages).
not wanting to start a troll, but ...
if you're trying to build a initrd kernel image, you want
make-kpkg to complain when you use --initrd without the patches
applied. that would be better yet. does anyone see any unforeseen
negative side effect ?
(I ran into trouble trying to build initrd support using SGI
CVS tree - I like XFS. I did not use debian kernel sources because
there is this little lag behind - and I wanted other patches like
ext3 and vlan, which are not packaged yet IIRC).
--------------------------------------------
AWAKE! FEAR! FIRE! FOES! AWAKE!
FEAR! FIRE! FOES!
AWAKE! AWAKE!
-- J. R. R. Tolkien
Reply to: