Re: make-kpkg
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, MaD dUCK wrote:
>
> also sprach Ian Eure (on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 01:25:25AM -0700):
> > lastversion=`cat /var/run/last_kernel_revision`
> > lastversion=$[lastversion+1]
> > echo ${lastversion} >/var/run/last_kernel_revision
> >
> > make-kpkg --revision `date "+%Y%m%d.%H%M"`.${lastversion}
>
> well, using HHMM after the dot does the same, does it not?
>
it does, but i was addressing your question. forgive me if i have
misunderstood.
> > > (2) --arch_in_name works for the i486 machine, yielding a filename
> > > kernel-image-2.4.5-embryo-i486_20010628.2129_i386.deb, but
> > > compiling it for either the pentium I, the pentium II, the AMD K6-2,
> > > or the Athlon yields a mere
> > > kernel-image-2.4.5-seamus_20010628.1453_i386.deb.
> > >
> > > What gives?
> > >
> > i believe that you are confused about the terms "architecture" and
> > "cpu". "arch" only specifies the family of processor, not the specific
> > type. and the pentium/ppro/p2 are all members of the i386 family. you
> > might want to stick the cpu type in the flavor or revision and drop
> > --arch_in_name if you really care about it.
>
> okay, you got me there. nevertheless, i use the same script for all
> CPU's, but embryo's filename includes i486 while seamus' filename does
> not include an equivalent i586.
>
you've got me there - i have no idea what's going on. i just compiled a
minimal 2.2.19 kernel for the pentium pro/2/3/4 (i686) and it came out
as: kernel-image-2.2.19-i686_test.1_i386.deb
so i can't reproduce your problem. are you sure your kernel config for
that system is correct?
Reply to: