Re: Is it too late to try and generalize PAM for woody?
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
> You aren't bringing up new ideas. That is the pam_inherit option.
Ah. So it is, after looking that option up. Ok. (Well, it's
essentially the same, though the details differ)
> As I said I'm not interested in having the technical discussion now;
> for the moment I'm just discussing whether solving this problem is a
> good idea.
Fair enough; then let me ask - did I correctly understand the problem?
If so, then I'd say that solving it properly is a very good idea.
Reply to: