Re: Is it too late to try and generalize PAM for woody?
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Martin <dtmartin24@home.com> writes:
Daniel> I've been following this thread and I have a small
Daniel> question as to why we'd need to overload/change the
Daniel> semantics of the /etc/pam.d/other file.
Daniel> Why not merely build a new pam module, called something
Daniel> like pam_chain, that does nothing but invoke other pam
Daniel> modules as specified in its configuration? To get an
Daniel> example of what I mean:
You aren't bringing up new ideas. That is the pam_inherit option.
As I said I'm not interested in having the technical discussion now;
for the moment I'm just discussing whether solving this problem is a
good idea.
Reply to: