[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --



Anthony Towns writes:
> Of course, none of this seems necessary, and RMS appears to have taken
> the "diff" example to heart

RMS's opinion is only relevant to packages on which he holds the copyright.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin



Reply to: