Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:35:31AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Yes, but Ben came up with the trick if putting the full GPL in the
> package, and replacing that file with a symlink in the postinst.
(Of course, none of this seems necessary, and RMS appears to have
taken the "diff" example to heart)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: