Re: fortunes optional or extra
On 31 May 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> On May 31, 9:30am, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > So I really don't know why it is listed under extra ... ????
>
> Because the archive manager though it should be priority extra?
> Remember that override fiel has priority over contents of the package when it
> comes to section, priority and maintainer.
So what to do to fix the situation of having fortune databases with
different priorities? I don't mind about the priority optional or extra
but it should be the same for all languages.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Reply to: