Re: package splitting and kernel-image
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:13:48PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:27:43AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Not at all. I read the thread regarding splitting kernel-image. I haven't
> > posted an opinion on it during this thread at all.
>
> So, how are you still unaware of the reasons behind the split?
I'm not unaware of them. My opinion of the split isn't relevant
to the point which I'm trying to make (and that you seem unable
to grasp).
Summary: you were unnecessarily rude in your bug reports regarding
the kernel-image-* and ash packages. You could have actually achieved
something if you had posted a short, succinct set of reasons for
making the changes you want. Instead you posted patches and
various irrelevancies.
> ash was badly worded, and I've apologised for that. Point me to the parts of
> 96854 that are insulting, and are worthy of an insulting 2-word response.
> And no, it's not a waste of time. I prefer my mirrors working.
That too mirrors are currently out of date in Australia has nothing
to do with either the rest of the world, nor Herbert Xu.
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: