[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages not making it into testing



On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Note that binary only recompiles should be versioned as either:
> > 	5.4.6-3   -> 5.4.6-3.0.1
> > or	5.4.6-3.1 -> 5.4.6-3.1.1
> Perhaps a silly question: What't the correct versioning for a binary NMU
> of a native package with version 1.2.3? A source NMU would have version
> 1.2.3-0.1 (according to the Developer's Reference), so should a binary NMU
> have 1.2.3-0.0.1?

The usual thing to do is to number it as:
	1.2.3 -> 1.2.3.1 (NMU)
	1.2.3 -> 1.2.3.0.1 (arch specific recompile)
ie, appending a ".0.1" to the source version.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)



Reply to: