** On May 08, Wichert Akkerman scribbled: > Previously Marek Habersack wrote: > > Put that way it makes perfect sense. But why use libtool then? > > last time I checked they didn't use libtool, although that might > have changed since then. 1.0.3 most definitely uses it :) > > > It might seem that they are planning/thinking of making it a bit larger > > project. > > That's not what I hear from its authors :) OK :) - that was just an assumption based on the presence of libtool :) > > Would it be feasible if only a tdb-dev package existed with an .a > > archive and a set of manpages/includes - at least it would be > > integrated with debian that way? > > That's not a bad plan. The packages are ready - tdb-dev, tdb-tools and tdb1 total 45k, the sources including diffs total 140k, so the package isn't dramatically large. Maybe it would make sense to upload it all? Or should I just make that single package as written above? marek -- Visit: http://caudium.net - the Caudium WebServer /* A completely unrelated fortune */ I think that I shall never see A billboard lovely as a tree. Indeed, unless the billboards fall I'll never see a tree at all. -- Ogden Nash
Attachment:
pgpF5CVkvYxRa.pgp
Description: PGP signature