Re: libggi2 and testing?
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All
> architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in
> the pool, but update-excuses gives no hints as to why it hasn't been
> accepted in testing. It (update-output) mumbles something incoherent about
> the package on alpha, but it's now been built for alpha.
Yup, but the version on alpha depends libc6.1 >= 2.2.3-1 or so, and
libc6 2.2.3-1 doesn't build on i386...
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: