Re: upgrading only urgency=high packages
>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
Matt> I discussed the idea a bit with James Troup, and one of his
Matt> concerns was that the database would be centralized, not
Matt> distributed over many mirrors like the packages themselves.
Matt> This would be a scalability problem if such a system were to
Matt> become popular. Judging by the response that
Matt> apt-listchanges received, and the interest people have in
Matt> the idea, it just might.
What about a distributed database, eg. openldap with slave LDAP
servers?
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: