Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer
- To: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 17:01:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010501170153.A8255@polya>
- In-reply-to: <87lmoirpjx.fsf@dt-jtlaptop.datatrans>; from james@nocrew.org on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:46PM +0100
- References: <20010430203910.A1380@polya> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104300535130.6393-100000@localhost> <20010430224157.D1330@polya> <20010430235059.A6573@cistron.nl> <20010430231408.A3323@polya> <87lmoirpjx.fsf@dt-jtlaptop.datatrans>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:46PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
>
> > What I am suggesting is that katie has a list of such cases (although
> > I'm not proposing a particular format):
>
> From my point of view, such information would ideally be:
>
> o not centrally controlled, but package/maintainer(s) controlled[0]
> o trivial (both in terms of code and CPU use) for katie to obtain[1]
> o not unnecessarily waste space in places it's not needed[2]
>
> I'd love to see suggestions that satisfy those criteria, but was
> eventually someday going to fall back on something like Julian just
> suggested if I couldn't find anything better.
The thought I had would be in the source paragraph of the control
file, but that fails [2]. However, I really don't know how many
packages we're talking about, and therefore whether it would actually
be much of a problem.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: