Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Josh Huber wrote:
> now what do we have?
>
> kernel-image-version-<subarch>-<cpu>
To be more complete we could have:
kernel-image-<version>-<subarch>-<cpu>-<scsi|ide>-<compact|modular>-<debugging?>-<filesystems>-....
</sarcasm>
I've said before that over 2000 kernel configuration options exist and
it's obviously not feasable to make a standard binary kernels with
every concievable combination. Of these options, CPU optionizations
are probably the least important.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Josh Huber <huber@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Josh Huber <huber@debian.org>