Re: Another case of `why isn't this in testing yet'
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:46:00AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> I wish I understood this. jazip-0.33-2 fixes a root exploit, so
> it would be nice to get it into testing:
> jazip 0.33-2 (currently 0.32-2) (extra) (high)
> Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> jazip uploaded 16 days ago, out of date by 14 days!
> valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent
> upon other buggy pkgs)
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1), libforms0.89, xlibs (>= 4.0.1-11)
> testing has: libc6 2.2.2-1
> libforms0.89 0.89-9
> xlibs 4.0.2-7
That's on i386. On alpha:
Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.2.2-2), libforms0.88, xlibs (>= 4.0.1-11)
But libc6.1 on alpha in testing is 2.2.2-1. libc6 has had issues recently
which has prevented it from being updated, but they should hopefully be
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)