Re: ITP: lb, lb-scripts
Previously Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> My guess is that most of the time the gatherer and the alerter run on
> the same machine.
The design definitely allows for that (I seperated functionality
into different seperate modules as much as possible) but I don't think
it would be very useful to run them on different machines, especially
since alerts are kept in an on-disk spool.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |