On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:07:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Fabrizio suggested that /usr/{share/}man/man7/undocumented.7.gz be moved > to debianutils. Actually, I think base-files would be more appropriate, > as they're miscellaneous Debian-specific files rather than miscellaneous > Debian-specific utilities. Would anyone object to me filing a wishlist > bug against base-files requesting this? Would the manpages maintainer be > able to provide a version of that package on which base-files could have > a versioned Replaces: if I did so? Why can't we just do away with this silly "undocumented" manpage? It never did what it was supposed to do - tell people that the maintainer knows about the problem and a bts entry exists. In fact it seems to be common that a maintainer just installs the link to undocumented and a real manpage is never written. Also I find it quite disturbing when using dpkg -L to find the docs of a package - ah, there is a manpage for foo. man foo -> undocumented. Funny! Thanks Torsten
Attachment:
pgpOowNeDfgbe.pgp
Description: PGP signature