[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Task harden.

On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:32:20PM -0400, Aubin Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:41:17PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:26:53PM -0400, Aubin Paul wrote:
> > > This might be a little off, but why not have a Debian package called
> > > nullinetd, that just provides netkit-inetd, but is essentially empty?
> > 
> > Well that can be a thing. But packages that does not really need inetd
> > should not depend on it. I have heared that some packages do but
> > that should be changed. But of course I can add such a package
> > if people wants that. :)
> Well, I only suggest this since the netbase maintainer seems reluctant
> to remove the dependency on inetd... since netbase is essential, inetd
> is by inference, also... so either he fixes it, or we workaround.

You apparently missed the mail today discussing a netbase split so
netbase won't depend on inetd.

Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Micromuse Ltd.                 | than a perfect plan tomorrow.
mailto:nnorman@micromuse.com   |   -- Patton

Attachment: pgpDQnZTdmruz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: