Re: testing is broken
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:59:37AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > However, that points to a more serious problem. Did packages get
> > downgraded in woody? That's a bad thing to do....
>
> Hell yeah they did. This was deliberate. When the testing/woody pool was
> inaugurated, it was an exact duplicate of potato. This was deliberate, and
> a special case.
Hrm, somehow I missed that.
Grr. Ok, I would have preferred the creation of a different release
name so those of us *using* the release name wouldn't have its meaning
changed from under us that way.
Thomas
Reply to: