[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why isn't gcc-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) packaged (for kernel 2.4 builds)



potato dist i386 here. I have:

-rwxr-xr-x    1 root  root  68476 Jun 20  2000 /usr/bin/gcc*
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root  root  60252 Mar 14 22:33 /usr/bin/gcc-2.91.66*
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root  root  46968 Apr  4  2000 /usr/bin/gcc272*

# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 20000220 (Debian GNU/Linux)

# gcc272 -v
ANYTHING
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.7.2.3/specs
ANYTHING
gcc version 2.7.2.3

# gcc-2.91.66 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release)

no conflicts here :)

Cheers,
Cristian

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Neil L. Roeth wrote:

[snip]

> Is the -V option supported under Debian at all?  AFAIK, if you install
> another version of gcc it will create a conflict at the package level.
> Is that correct?  Maybe we should look into how to support that option
> directly, e.g., by having packages for different versions, e.g.,
> gcc295, gcc291.  I've seen gcc272, why not for others?  (I suspect I
> may have just brought up a topic that has been rehashed many times
> before, but I haven't seen the discussion, so forgive me if that is
> the case.)



Reply to: