Re: The util-linux reorganisation

[cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)]

Henrique M Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> I package can't remove itself in its postinst, and one does that would be
>> a grave bug.
>
>It didn't remove itself in its postinst. It scheduled a background process
>to run as soon as the dpkg lock was removed, and that process did a purge on
>the package.
>
>I don't recall which package it was, though.

sgmltools-2, and it was truly hideous.

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]