Re: The util-linux reorganisation
Previously Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> In other words, replace all files of a package and dpkg considers that it
> has 'disappeared', I believe?
Indeed.
> It didn't remove itself in its postinst. It scheduled a background process
> to run as soon as the dpkg lock was removed, and that process did a purge on
> the package.
That's gross..
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: