Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > been meaning to respond to this -- from talking to Joey it seems that > > it's not so much that the format is not flexible enough (I'd argue it's > > actually more flexible), but that the existing parsers in debconf are more > > suited to the format Joey posted earlier. I'll try to put together a bind8- > > style cdebconf compatible parser for Joey's consideration. > > Shouldn't we start exploring XML? No. -- see shy jo