Re: automating debconf
Craig Sanders schrieb:
> it wouldn't be a problem at all (in fact, it would be a fantastic tool!)
> if debconf was also able to accept answers to questions from stdin.
This would be a suboptimal fix. It seems we really need that
database library for debconf, else it is going to make life
harder for many admins who want to automate package
installation/upgrading and configuration to some degree.
I know some perl and would be willing to help, though I am
neither an experienced programmer nor anything near a database
BTW: what's the canonical list for debconf discussion, d-dpkg?
Windows95: 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit
patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit
microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1
bit of competition.