Re: ITP: lynx-cur -- lynx of current development version
From: Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: ITP: lynx-cur -- lynx of current development version
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:58:59 +0100 (CET)
> In general, we should not package beta stuff for unstable.
> That's what project/experimental is for.
> If it's stable enough, it should replace current lynx.
In general, I agree with you but general theory is not enough,
lynx has its specific problem and situation. I think to provide
both lynx and lynx-cur is better than only stable lynx or only
Further, it might be best if lynx and lynx-cur co-exist at the
same time. Only if lynx adopt alternatives, this is easy to
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <email@example.com>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.