Re: Packages removed from testing
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:45:20 +1000, Anthony Towns
<aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 10:08:30AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>> > Yes, it makes it obvious that woody's not even remotely releasable at the
>> > moment.
>> With a potato package, it would be releasable though. We don't need
>> "fixed sid" packages to release, we just need stable ones.
>
>Dowgrading packages is generally a bad thing because everyone using apt
>to stay current with testing won't get the new package, so we'll have
>inconsistent test environments.
One can always fiddle with version numbers. Not nice, but possible.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Reply to: