Re: FHS compliance and UNIX sockets
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: FHS compliance and UNIX sockets
- From: Michael Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 10:05:16 -0500
- Message-id: <20010203100516.A16502@justice.loyola.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <20010130142512.K24991@kitenet.net>; from firstname.lastname@example.org on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:25:12PM -0800
- References: <email@example.com> <200101290647.f0T6lbF28325@linda.lfix.co.uk> <20010129205852.D1255@azure.humbug.org.au> <20010129205948.B20839@holomorphy.com> <20010130065613.R686@justice.loyola.edu> <20010130142512.K24991@kitenet.net>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:25:12PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Amen. per-user tmpdirs are the way to go. It would be great if debian
> could somehow support them by default.
There's some work being done on that via pam. When that's complete, it
should be easy to pick up.