Re: Package Reorganisations
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
Anthony> You'll note it's not available in unstable though, and
Anthony> that libssl09 is built from openssl sources. So if
Anthony> libssl09 were to remain in woody when openssl is updated,
Anthony> it'll no longer be buildable from source, which would be
Anthony> bad. Hence if openssl gets updated, libssl09 will be
Anthony> removed, just like it is in unstable.
Oh, so any packages removed from unstable will eventually
automatically get removed from testing too.
Thanks - that makes sense now.
Do the auto-builders realize that a package relies on out-of-date
libraries and automatically rebuild?
If so, what happens to the version number of the resultant *.deb file
(this probably touches on a point I raised in another thread today)?
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>