Re: Package Reorganisations
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
Anthony> Well, first: please try to avoid it wherever
Anthony> possible. Making a dependency unsatisfiable is a Bad
Anthony> Thing, and not something to be done if you don't have a
Anthony> *very* good reason for it.
I don't understand, why should you ever have to do it?
Anthony> Fourth: if, after you've made sure that _all_ packages in
Anthony> unstable, in _all_ architectures have been rebuilt with
Anthony> the new dependencies, you find that your package isn't
Anthony> going into testing, mail me so I can special case the
Anthony> update in the scripts.
I don't think openssl is getting installed (still).
* openssl 0.9.6-1 (currently 0.9.4-5) (low)
+ Maintainer: Christoph Martin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
+ openssl uploaded 22 days ago, out of date by 12 days!
+ valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon
other buggy pkgs)
$ madison libssl096
libssl096 | 0.9.6-1 | unstable | alpha, arm, i386, m68k, mips, powerpc, sparc
Depends only contains an entry for libc6, at least on i386.
...so everything looks OK to me.
Brian May <email@example.com>