Re: non-US/main or non-US???

[James Troup <james@nocrew.org>]

Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org> writes:

> >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
>     Matt> non-US/contrib.
> 
> In which case why is non-US/main incorrect?

*sigh*, here's what I actually wrote in reply to Brian.  Apologies to
those who have already read this.

 | Brian May <bam@debian.org> writes:
 | 
 | > Section: non-US/main
 | 
 | [...]
 | 
 | > Section: non-US
 | > 
 | > instead. Which one is correct?
 | 
 | The latter.
 |  
 | > Personally, I thought the first one would be required, as it clearly
 | > states that my package belongs in main, and not in non-free.
 | 
 | Well, let's put it this way: do packages in utils have a section of
 | "main/utils" or "utils"?
 | 
 | However this is not what the override disparity checking stuff was
 | meant to be looking for; I'll make it ignore this.
 | 
 | -- 
 | James

-- 
James