Re: non-US/main or non-US???
Stephen Zander <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> writes:
> Matt> non-US/contrib.
> In which case why is non-US/main incorrect?
*sigh*, here's what I actually wrote in reply to Brian. Apologies to
those who have already read this.
| Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| > Section: non-US/main
| > Section: non-US
| > instead. Which one is correct?
| The latter.
| > Personally, I thought the first one would be required, as it clearly
| > states that my package belongs in main, and not in non-free.
| Well, let's put it this way: do packages in utils have a section of
| "main/utils" or "utils"?
| However this is not what the override disparity checking stuff was
| meant to be looking for; I'll make it ignore this.