Re: non-US/main or non-US???

[James Troup <james@nocrew.org>]

Brian May <bam@debian.org> writes:

> Section: non-US/main

[...]

> Section: non-US
> 
> instead. Which one is correct?

The latter.
 
> Personally, I thought the first one would be required, as it clearly
> states that my package belongs in main, and not in non-free.

Well, let's put it this way: do packages in utils have a section of
"main/utils" or "utils"?

However this is not what the override disparity checking stuff was
meant to be looking for; I'll make it ignore this.

-- 
James