Re: Problems with using debconf in init script...
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:00:05AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Well, I'd rather prefer to have the configuration information nicely
> separated from the script. Note, one file per script and human
> editable. That allows the maintainer to update the script without
> forcing the admin to merge manually. I'm not sure if this is what SuSE
> does, but I don't see why it would be bad.
Use, umm, /etc/default/<service> then. See bug #66912, which should be
in policy version 126.96.36.199.
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)