Re: Optimisations query

To: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@salin.org>
Cc: DDML <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Optimisations query
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:03:36 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010121200336.H1119@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@salin.org>, DDML <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010107224953.75A7634973@storm.localdomain>; from michel@salin.org on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:49:53PM +0000
References: <[🔎] 20010107224953.75A7634973@storm.localdomain>

Previously Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I have not actually tried running RH 7 on an i486 but I'm sure it
> would work. So the question is, why not adopt this for Debian too?

I have yet to see any statistics that show that doing this actually
gives you any significant benefit. Having a 1% speedup in ls is
completely useless for example..

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Optimisations query
  - From: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@salin.org>

Prev by Date: Re: dpkg -L (was: Re: conflicts with libcap-dev)
Next by Date: Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
Previous by thread: Re: Optimisations query
Next by thread: Processed: hmmm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread