Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:00:08 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010121200008.G1119@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010107201912.21865Q-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>; from jgg@debian.org on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:22:04PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 87zoh2lonb.fsf@rover.gag.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010107201912.21865Q-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>

Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Has anyone checked out what the size hit is, and how well ryncing debs
> like this  performs in actual use?

Size hit is under 1%, and combined with the rsync --fuzzy stuff you get
about 65% (iirc) less data send over the wire compared to a normal
mirror. I'm guessing all of Rustys data will appear on
http://linux.conf.au/ soon.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
- Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Optimisations query
Next by Date: Re: Packages and signatures
Previous by thread: Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
Next by thread: Re: Solving the compression dilema when rsync-ing Debian versions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread