Re: Two versions in the archives
Peter Makholm <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Adrian Bunk <email@example.com> writes:
>> We have already examples of two different versions of a program packaged,
>> e.g. xemacs20 and xemacs21 or fvwm1 and fvwm.
>Yes and I have allway hated that. It took me a long time to find out
>why my emacs didn't get upgraded as i should do. At least make it hard
>to use old versions not hard to follow the upstream version. (well
>thats what fvwm did assuming the above packages is correct but havn't
>we had fvwm2 packages with a "2" in its names?
While it was unstable, yes; trn and trn4 are in much the same situation
right now. (If trn4 ever gets released out of testing upstream, I'd like
to rename these to trn3 and trn.)
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]