Re: BIND 9.X package status
>>>>> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <email@example.com> writes:
Josip> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee
>> bind9-lib (?) - shared libraries ? these may just end up in
>> package bind9, I'm still working on the details
>> bind9-dev - static libraries and include files
Josip> Those two should be named libbind9 and libbind-dev (resp.)
Josip> to be in line other libs.
Only if 9 is the major version of the library...
Here it seems to be the version of bind, not the shared library.
I have to wonder if it is really worth having a different name for the
newer package version. Are the versions really that different?
Personally, I would prefer to have apt-get automatically upgrade the
package, and that will be disabled once you include the version number
in the package number.
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>