Re: egcs/gcc?
Previously J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> s/gains popularity/offers the functionality that a very large majority of
> people rely on in 2.2/.
People still rely on 2.0. Not for features, but stability.
> For me, 2.4 currently lacks
> - x25tap
> - kerneli crypto patches
> - ReiserFS
> and I'm sure there's quite a lot of stuff others use with 2.2 that hasn't
> been ported to 2.4 yet.
In that case ReiserFS is a really bad example, it might never be in 2.2 and
Linus said it will be added in the 2.4 series. It's 2.4 support is also
on level if not better then its 2.2 support.
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: