[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

MS>>>"John" == John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
MS> SG> Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back
MS> SG> to the originator, as it is supposed to do.
MS> John> Well, you replied to the list alone despite my reply-to, so I guess your
MS> John> actions don't match your words...  
MS>	He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone
MS> can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply
MS> to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the
MS> reply-to header would have been respected).

Yeah, but he was making the point that the reply-to header broke things
like listreplies.  They still seem to work....

MS>	manoj

Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a
email galt@inconnu.isu.edu

Reply to: