Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
On 4 Jan 2001, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
MS>>>"John" == John Galt <email@example.com> writes:
MS> SG> Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back
MS> SG> to the originator, as it is supposed to do.
MS> John> Well, you replied to the list alone despite my reply-to, so I guess your
MS> John> actions don't match your words...
MS> He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone
MS> can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply
MS> to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the
MS> reply-to header would have been respected).
Yeah, but he was making the point that the reply-to header broke things
like listreplies. They still seem to work....
Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a