Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>>"John" == John Galt <email@example.com> writes:
SG> Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back
SG> to the originator, as it is supposed to do.
John> Well, you replied to the list alone despite my reply-to, so I guess your
John> actions don't match your words...
He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone
can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply
to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the
reply-to header would have been respected).
Whenever one word or letter can change the entire meaning of a
sentence, the probability of an error being made will be in direct
proportion to the embarrassment it will cause. -- Bob Considine
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C