[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

>>"John" == John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:

 SG> Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back
 SG> to the originator, as it is supposed to do.

 John> Well, you replied to the list alone despite my reply-to, so I guess your
 John> actions don't match your words...  

	He may have, as I do, intend to reply to the list, so everyone
 can see the conversation. (Quite properly, my MUA ignored the reply
 to on a list reply; had I cared to respond to you personally, the
 reply-to header would have been respected).

 Whenever one word or letter can change the entire meaning of a
 sentence, the probability of an error being made will be in direct
 proportion to the embarrassment it will cause.  -- Bob Considine
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: