Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>>"Ethan" == Ethan Benson <email@example.com> writes:
Ethan> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.
Ethan> oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older
Ethan> versions of Gnus ignored M-F-To but the current one does not.
Considering the mail-followup-to stuff was only introduced in
a failed standards attempt in 1998, it is not surprising that
versions of Gnus before that (not having the gift of prescience) did
not honour that.
Ethan> go fuck off.
You prove my point. Resorting to invective is the last refuge
of the incompetent. This is your second demonstration of incompetence
in a public forum in 24 hours; and I suspect your drop in the
estimation of the readers of this mailing list is far worse than any
response in kind I could indulge in.
There are times when truth is stranger than fiction and lunch time is
one of them.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C