Re: holding back the tide
>>>>> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Bdale> email@example.com (Adam Heath) writes:
>> Bdale hates dbs, doesn't know what it is
Bdale> I don't hate dbs. I just get annoyed when packages with
Bdale> complicated build-time patching schemes won't build. My
Bdale> sense is that each of these schemes increases the
Bdale> probability of build-time failures by deferring work that
Bdale> is done for most packages at the source package
Bdale> construction time to the build time... but if the packages
Bdale> are competently constructed and tested, I don't really care
Bdale> how they're structured.
Has anyone ever considered packing dbs in a separate package?
1. all packages that use dbs automatically use the same version. There
is no need to worry about minor differences between different
2. extra tools can be added to help users do some of the more tedious
3. packages can build-depends: dbs which clearly shows that the
package uses and requires dbs.
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>